Christianity was intended by Jesus to be a minority position
and always will be. He wasn’t dividing
the world into those God loved and those God didn’t love. Jesus was creating a remnant who were useable by God – to keep the
whole world from its violent path toward self destruction…. That is very different from forming a new
tribe of saved and superior people.
Richard
Rohr
____________________________________
from the moment he took his first breath
and lay squalling among the cows and sheep
Jesus was aligned with the poor and vulnerable
he spent time as a refugee
he grew up rural (as far as we can tell)
he was a blue collar kind of guy
his ministry was to the common folk
the dirt farmers
the street people
the nobodies
the riff-raff
Oh sure, he spent a little time with
some rich folk
but many of them were shady
and the few moments he spent with the religious elite?
let’s just say both sides were disappointed
they in the uncouth libertarian they saw
he in the rigid, arrogant moralism
Jesus never lined up with the power structure of his day
He didn’t use the “elite”
and he didn’t allow them to use him
instead he hung out with the poor and the powerless
the sick
the sinners
those who were so very, very “out” of power
it is interesting that when he talks about the Kingdom
he uses images like “yeast”
and talks of the “small” permeating and transforming
everything
The way of Jesus was always meant to be transformative
It was always meant to align with the “least of these”
It was always meant to stand against the power structure
of the day,
Because power and wealth corrupt
and when the church aligns with corruption
it is corrupted
and becomes useless
there is no more unholy alliance than
religion and political power
and when the church tries to use political power to reach
its ends
it ends up abusive, and lost
when political powers try to use the church to reach
their ends
they corrupt the church
and reveal their own paucity
if the church would deign to touch the world
with the love of God
it must be like yeast
separate, unique, powerful
yet mixed in
what would happen if the church dared oppose earthly
power?
(it did, at one time, a long time ago, briefly)
what would happen if the church said
lying is wrong
greed is wrong
trickle down is bullshit
coercion doesn’t work?
abusive power is evil?
what if the church did that?
instead of lining up with things “not Jesus”
to promote its “agenda”
what if the church trusted God rather than Presidents?
what if it relied on love rather than coercion
what if it fought for the poor, rather that cater
(pander) to the rich
what if supported the way of peace rather than violence,
what if it went with servanthood rather than domination
we are so afraid of letting go of influence
of earthly power
we think that if we win the White House,
or stack the Supreme Court with “our people”
or use might to create right
we will somehow “win the day” for God
but when we align with power
it gets ugly
always
and the way of God loses
the foolishness of the cross tells us
that if we want to change the world
we have to align with God
who is aligned with the poor and the vulnerable
we have to be a remnant people
who dare to abandon
the way of domination
who dare oppose the way of inequity and privilege
who dare stand up for justice, and against oppression
who dare to serve rather than dominate
choosing the way of earthly power has never done anything
but rob us of spiritual power
and create a destructive tribalism
that crushes and kills
so here is to the losers
here is to the poor
here is to the humble
here is to those who will give up everything
everything
in order to welcome
forgive
heal
and love
here is to those who are willing to be the yeast that
changes the whole
rather than the hammer that merely destroys